--PART.BOUNDARY.0.22566.emout19.mail.aol.com.833334043
Content-ID: <0_22566_833334043@emout19.mail.aol.com.200874>
Content-type: text/plain
Please find attached the posting:
--PART.BOUNDARY.0.22566.emout19.mail.aol.com.833334043
Content-ID: <0_22566_833334043@emout19.mail.aol.com.200875>
Content-type: text/plain;
name="KT3Y"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0D
KT3Y CW WPX Score S/O HP unassisted
=0D
My congratulations to KE2PF for an exceptional score. With marginal condx=
overall and heavy QRN on the low bands, a "super" station clearly makes =
a difference. =
=0D
In addition, my congratulations to Bob KQ2M (4.6M) who beat my "all wire=
" =
antenna score with a similar setup. Also congratulations to Fred K3ZO =
for taking the PVRC top spot with 4.7 M. =
=0D
QSO Points Prefixes =
160 2 4 0 Compressed delta loop =
80 92 372 20 Phased dipoles NE/SW, NW/SE dipole
40 790 3554 376 3L wire beam NE, N/S, E/W dipoles
20 997 2412 259 5L wire beams NE and NW, stacked dipol=
es
(N/S, E/W)
15 46 114 19 5L wire beam NE, 3 lazy Hs
=0D
1927 6456 674 =3D 4,351,344 =
=0D
Station Description:
=0D
IC765/AL1200
IC765/AL82
=0D
All antennas mounted between trees. Heights 70 to 80 feet maximum.
Three two wire beverages (maximum length 450 feet) for receive.
=0D
I was pleased with the performance of the 3L 40 beam. It is an exceptiona=
l =
antenna with a very good pattern. I am not sure of the exact height but
would estimate 75 feet maximum.
=0D
The phased dipoles on 80 (spaced about a quarter wave) also appear very =
promising. Computer modeling indicates that the gain over a dipole at =
70 feet is 4.5 db bidirectionally with a lower radiation angle. =
=0D
73, Phil =
=0D
--PART.BOUNDARY.0.22566.emout19.mail.aol.com.833334043--
|