Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: acrimony

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: acrimony
From: jhenders@zianet.com (Jim Henderson)
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 09:06:47 -0600
>Excuse me...  But the only thing I ever objected to was getting in the 
>middle of this fiasco.  I don't care if AG6K, W8JI, and KM1H talk about 
>each other's mothers on this system.  I just don't want to hear about it 
>when they do.  I dont have the time.  

        And I second that. Technical disagreement is educational for the
general readership, acrimonious personal commentary is disrespectful the the
readers and belongs on back-channel e-mail. Engineering is a profession, can
we not remain professional?

        Nuff said; next thread please.

Jim, KF7E
Jim Henderson

jhenders@zianet.com
jhenders@tdrss.wsc.nasa.gov
kf7e@k5di.nm.usa.noam


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] Re: acrimony, Jim Henderson <=