Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Alpha models: 91B vs. 89

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Alpha models: 91B vs. 89
From: jmaass@freenet.columbus.oh.us (Jeffrey Maass)
Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 20:28:35 -0400 (EDT)
I am attempting to select between the Alpha 89 and the 
Alpha 91B and would appreciate the advice of the experts  
here assembled. I don't require automatic bandswitching.
 
I intend to keep this amplifier for a long while. My uses
are contesting and DXing (especially on 160, 80 and 40). 
I value equipment that will chug along at legal limit for 
the contest period without problems to distract me from the
operation at hand. It will be used with my C-Line and 
FT-1000MP.
 
I've got the information provided by Alpha, (including QST 
reviews of the 87A and the 91B) and the responses from a 
request posted on the Topband list. A short summary of 
the differences between the two amps is below. Comments / 
Additions?
 
                Alpha 91B               Alpha 89
 
Tubes (2)       Svetlana 4CX800A        Eimac 3CX800A7
T/R             Vacuum relay            PIN diode 
Dial            Direct                  Geared (?), lighted
Grid Metering   Min/Max LEDs            Bar led meter
Transformer     3.5kVA Unisil-H         ? kVA Hipersil
PS Diodes       5A discrete diodes      Block diode
HV              Single value            Switched: "SSB / CW"
Input           Tuned input not req'd   Tuned Input
RF Ratings      Same                    Same
Bandswitch      7 Position              9 Position
Size            7" High                 7.5" High 
Color, Finish   Same                    Same
Parts Source    Bulgaria, Russia, USA   USA
Manufactured    Bulgaria                Colorado
Warrenty        4 Year                  4 Year
Price (US$)     $2700                   $3700        
Aux. Fan        $  40                   $  40 
 
I have been told the following tidbits: confirmation or debunkments?
 
1) Early 91B production was plagued with heat-related problems,
    and at some point they replaced the Bulgarian blower with the
    same blower used in the 87A. (The reporter said that this is a
    different blower than that in the 89: true?) The cause of the 
    heat problems was later traced to the bias circuit and solved,
    but the blower was not switched back. 
 
2) The 87A / 89 switch using PIN diodes, and had reliability problems 
    early-on. The ARRL review reported on these problems, and 
    reported that the problems had been solved: true? 
 
3) The 91B is reportedly louder in operation (ignoring for the moment
    the sound of the vacuum relay. I presume that this is the noise
    of teh blower and (possibly) transformer hum. How significant is
    the difference?
 
4) Opinions have been pretty evenly split on whether the construction
    quality of the 91B and 89 is comparable. 

5) Is the auxilliary fan a good idea for someone who will be making
    contest use of one of these models? How much noise does it add?
    
I appreciate any inputs or guidance! I'm planning to make the 
choice and purchase some time in June.
 
73,

Jeff Maass       (jmaass@freenet.columbus.oh.us)      Amateur Radio K8ND
      USPSA/IPSC # L-1192   NROI/CRO          NW of Columbus Ohio
      25000 Members in 2000!



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>