Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: skin depth suppression

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: skin depth suppression
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Sat, 24 May 97 12:03:04 -0700
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 13:15:23 -0500
>>To: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>>From: Phil Clements <philk5pc@connect.net>
>>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: skin depth suppression
>>
>At 09:48 AM 5/24/97 -0700, you wrote:
>....snip....
>>..... ..... ... Wes' scientific measurements of 3-500Z suppressors indicated 
>> that a adding a few ohms of ESR in Ls lowered the VHF-Rp of the DUT from 
>>166-ohms to 101 ohms...
>>
>But alas..Wes blew off the significance of the 65 ohm drop; discounting it
>as "not a dime's worth of difference."

True.  However, Wes' comment about the likely licking duties of my 
secretary appeared to discount Wes' evaluation by about two cents.  . . . 
 OTOH, if Mr. Rauch turns out to be right about VHF voltage-amplification 
being INVERSELY proportional to VHF-Rp, then 166-ohms of Rp IS 
substantively better than 101 ohms of Rp, which means that both Wes AND 
Rich will be absolutely, positively WRONG.   
>snip.....
>
>(((73)))
>Phil, K5PC

Rich---

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>