Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Discussion (and more)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Discussion (and more)
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 14:22:35 -0700
>Warning:  The Surgeon General has determined that this post does not 
>include personal insults or exaggerated formality, 

What do you call a chap who calls himself Englebert Schlong and Kurt 
Schlong?  If I refer to him as Mr. Schlong, I can't go wrong.   

>so readers of the 
>Amps Reflector might not find it stimulating!
>
Stimulation may be a bit of an exaggeration.  

>...  All I can say is that I've 
>probably learned more about the individuals concerned than about 
>amplifiers!

I try to concentrate on things technical, Chris.  However, a substantive 
technical review that puts someone's guru in an unfavorable light is sure 
to start a fight.  
 A test:  go to Will's 266k-word vhf parasitics debate archive, search 
for the word 'IDIOTIC'.  How many times did each combatant and each 
sycophant use the word?    

>........ I was given a few vague answers, 
>in line with my suppositions stated in the original question.  It 
>took a direct request to a known expert .....

Was this 'expert' a participant on [AMPS], Chris?
Rich---

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>