Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] QST Review...

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] QST Review...
From: w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net (w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net)
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 22:39:17 +0000
> Actually, what struck me MOST about this review was that it reinforced just
> how good the Ten-Tec Titan is.  
> 
> QST reviewed the Titan in April, 1986, and their testing showed "All
> spurious and harmonic emissions are at least 66 dB below the fundamental
> output.  
> 
> Is it correct to compare that number against, say the 45/49 dB numbers QST
> measured from the 91B?

Not correct.

Spurious and harmonics are either harmonics or oscillations, and are 
usually measured with a single tone carrier. 

IMD results from modulation products, and are generally measure with 
a two tone signal.

73 Tom
73, Tom W8JI

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [AMPS] QST Review..., Steve Sacco KC2X
    • [AMPS] QST Review..., w8jitom@postoffice.worldnet.att.net <=