Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] resistance to......

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] resistance to......
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 98 09:49:25 -0800
>
>Carl says:
>
>>The resistors as used here are a pair of 100 Ohm 5W MOX in
>>parallel....they do get a bit warm with a 3-500Z at 50MHz but not
>>alarmingly warm after a full minute key down.
>
>Carl, is there not an advantage to the 'classical' approach that as the
>operating frequency goes down, the shunt reactance goes down, so there is
>less loss in the resistors? I was taught that you use the minimum amount of
>inductance that stops the parasitic, 'cos that gives least loss in the
>suppressor.
>
As operating freq. decreases, L-sup can increase without risk to R-sup.  
More L-sup equates to lower VHF Q in the anode resonant circuit, which 
improves VHF stability.  //  Also, what it takes to stop the parasitic is 
probably not going to be the same for all tubes. Better to go an extra 
mile, methinks.    

-  later, Peter


Rich...

R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>