Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] 4CX3000A - getting one tested?

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] 4CX3000A - getting one tested?
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 98 19:14:48 -0800
>
>Hi folks,
>Some time back a non-ham friend of mine gave me an Eimac 4CX3000A. It
>was supposedly pulled from commercial service with full output, but I
>have no way to test it. Ultimately I'd like to swap it for something I
>can use, but I need to know if the tube is any good. Where I can get
>this tube tested?

... at either one of the tube rebuilders.  However, if I had an 
4CX3000A/8169 and it supposedly tested low on emission, I would have it 
tested  elsewhere.  Unsolicited advice:  write the s/n of the tube down 
and check it against the returned tube.  //  The main disadvantages of 
the 8169 are:  socket (Y330B) rarity, socket cost, and the high pressure 
requirement of the blower.  I would try to trade for an 8171.  It has a 
larger more efficient, cooler.  It has handles.  A quiet, slow speed,  
blower will cool an 8171 very ok for amateur service.  SK-300a sockets 
are easy to come by.  The chassis space req. is c. the same as a 
4-1000A/8166 w. glass chimney.   In Class A, the power out is around 
1500w.  In Class AB1, somewhat more.  However, one should not use more 
power than is necessary to communicate.  Info on an 8171 grid and bridge 
neut. circuit is available on my Web site. 
-  later, Doug

Rich. Measures.  Web site:  www.vcnet.com/measures


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>