Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] ARRL and QST (and CW Relevance)

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] ARRL and QST (and CW Relevance)
From: dhearn@ix.netcom.com (dan hearn)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 07:36:34 -0800
Well said Tom. You have a knack for getting to the heart of the matter. How
many VHF distance records are made using SSB? How many EME contacts are made
by modes other than CW? In WW2 there were cases of POW's tearing up radios
to  make QRP CW transmitters and working outside. Could you make a SSB
transmitter out of those parts? Not likely. You have read of pilots and
others sending CW by using the mike button to key broken am transmitters in
emergencies or sending cw with their auto horns. If you don't understand CW
you can't do any of these things. Emergency communication means more than
turning on your HT and working through the local repeater. 73, Dan, N5AR

T A RUSSELL wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:05:38 -0600 Andy Wallace <andywallace@home.com>
> writes:
> >
> >More third grade style strawman arguments--nobody suggested
> >making the written exams easier--lets make them HARDER
> but dealing with relevant  information.
> >
> >Andy K5VM
> >
>
> A  nice sounding  SIMPLISTIC  PLATITUDE,    BUT,
>
> RELEVANT   to   WHO?
>
> Who decides WHAT is relevant?
>
> What really is relevant?
>
> CW  was deemed RELEVANT by International Agreement
> so that anyone using a radio would be able to recognize
> a DISTRESS call.  Remember the TITANIC?
>
> CW  truly is the INTERNATIONAL  LANGUAGE.
>
> Someone trained in CW can recognize a distress call
> even though he cannot understand a word of English.
> Using Q-signals (such as QTH) relevant INFORMATION
> can be passed between people who have NO common language
> other than CW.
>
> THAT is the RELEVANCE of CW.
>
> I don't buy the feeble excuse that someone can't learn the code.
> There may be a miniscule number of exceptions, but MOST
> peoply who cry they can't learn the code simply aren't willing
> to put forth the time and effort to do so.  IMHO, If you are too
> lazy to learn the code, you shouldn't  play the game.
>
> On the technical side,  CW  is capable of producing the
> highest Signal to Noise ratio because it has the narrowest
> Bandwidth of all modulation systems.  That alone keeps it
> "relevant" as a viable means of communication under
> adverse conditions.
>
> de   Tom   N4KG
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>