[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] More on B&W 850 as tank coil

To: <>
Subject: [AMPS] More on B&W 850 as tank coil
From: (
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 19:12:24 -0800
Too bad they are RIP. If I had the choice of rags--73-QST-CQ or HR I would
without hesitation go with HR. 2nd choice is 73 but the construction
articles are few and in between.

QST and CQ are nothing equipment vendor brochures.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Ogden <>
Cc: Amps Reflector <>
To: <>
Date: Monday, February 08, 1999 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: [AMPS] More on B&W 850 as tank coil

>>Was this not covered in a "HAM RADIO" article back when HR was still
>>in the small format????
>Don't know.  I never got HR.
>Jon Ogden
>    <--- CHECK IT OUT!  It's been updated!!!!!
>"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
>FAQ on WWW:     
>Administrative requests:

FAQ on WWW:     
Administrative requests:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>