>The idea was to increase the minimum required C. You can move the tap
>around for other stepups but the balanced T arrangement is the one most
>Adding another completely seperate L ahead of the 10M coil works on paper
>but I have not tried it ; but would seem to add a reverse requirement on
>the lower band taps.
You and I suggest the same thing from what I can tell. Who cares if it
is 2 seperate inductors or tapped in the middle of one. I don't follow
your logic. Perhaps I didn't read your original post correctly or
As for having a reverse requirement on the other bands I don't understand
that either. The L-net comprised of the Cout of the tube and the new
inductor is of a low-pass topology. So as you go lower in frequency its
effect becomes less and less.
>Nothing is simple!
http://www.qsl.net/ke9na <--- CHECK IT OUT! It's been updated!!!!!
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com