>
>
>> from an old parts list. Then there was a 4 uF shunt C. In the final
>> design I followed the first section with a second series L, about 3.5 H
>> (small and inexpensive) and another shunt 4 uF. This gave excellent ripple
>> rejection for even 720 Hz, and also was very well regulated due to the
>> resonant choke. It was modelled to prevent any resonances at power line
>> multiples, or at 50 or 60 Hz, in case a rectifier failed open, and allowed
>> half wave operation.
>
>In 1970, I was almost killed by a resonant choke supply.
>
>I built a resonant filter driven by a full wave bridge and a 4160 volt
>RMS 10 kVA pole pig. All parts had a large amount of headroom, I
>used power line power factor correction caps in the supply.
>
>I made the choke EXACTLY resonant by following the guidelines in
>Bill Orr's Handbook.
>
? Rumour has it that tuning the choke to 155Hz works a bit better than
tuning it to 120Hz.
>When I powered-up the PA, the 3-500's arced from anode to grid
>and the breakers dumped. Removing the tune anode connection,
>on the next power-up a 20 kV bypass capacitor exploded.
>
? What was the value of the bleeder R in the HV supply, Tom?
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|