Marv
>On Mon, 26 Jul 1999 13:37:05 -0700 Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>writes:
>
>>> Also, under this scheme, there is little incentive to design efficient
>>>power amplifiers. Sigh...
>>>
>>Ä So build a G2DAF "Class C Linear". As long as the splatter is
>>confined to the Amateur Radio Service band in use, and interference to
>>ongoing emergency communications does not take place, it's perfectly
>>legal according to Part 97.
>>
>
>Hi Rich,
> Noooooo, I don't think I shall.... and recalling my limited knowledge
>of the DAF, I think it was more zero bias Class B (or AB2) than a Class C
>creation... not considering the dynamic screen action.
>
>
> I do have my own crazy Class C (also part time A & B) linear amplifier
>under construction, if you caught the note I sent to Peter in response to
>an envelope modulation query a couple months back. Doing it mostly just
>for fun with a 4-400.
>
>
> Incidently, SPLATTER, as defined as an emission outside necessary
>bandwidth, is no longer permitted under FCC Part 97 neither without nor
>within the Ham band in use. Check section 97.307b, October '95 or later.
> The splatter "enabling" note, to which I presume you referred, that
>previously followed section 97.73, before the great renumbering, is no
>more! About time!! :-)
>
>
? Indeed. thanks, Marv
Rich...
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|