>
>Examining the cited test results was not intended to prove that the G2DAF
>circuit was a good circuit or that the stated Eimac specifications could not
>be improved. It was merely intended to question the broad statement that
>the G2DAF circuit was bad because of the example cited of -22 db 3rd order
>distortion.
? It was not "the example". There were two.
>
>Frankly, I am not smart enough to know whether the G2DAF circuit is "good"
>or "bad" without reading something that convinces me or doing tests myself
>and seeing the results.
? amen. . This is why I conducted the voice tests in question.
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|