Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Measures Parasitic suppresor?/Tentec/Emtron

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Measures Parasitic suppresor?/Tentec/Emtron
From: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:30:22 -0700
>
>I was looking at Ten Tecs new amp at www.tentec.com , 
>it looks like they using one of the Measures parasitic
>nichrome suppressors. Am i right or is my eyes
>deceiving me? Likewise www.emtron.com.au, their DX2
>uses something that looks like a nichrome suppressor. 
>
>
Igor.  --  Nickle-chromium is similar in appearance to tinned copper, 
even though the resistance is 50x higher.  //  I have doubts that Ten Tec 
would use a resistance-wire suppressor.  To wit:  When a Ten Tec Titan 
425 owner and *QST* reader (Prose Walker) was unable to solve a 
mysterious tank arcing problem, he wrote to me.  I sent him a low VHF-Q 
suppressor retrofit kit to try.   Mr. Walker installed the kit and 
reported that the arcing appeared to stop.  He wrote to Ten Tec and 
reported his finding.  Ten Tec wrote back and said they had read the 
first article on improved anode parasitic suppressors (*QST*, Oct., 
1988).  However, when they tried low-Q VHF suppressors, Ten Tec 
discovered that the suppressors became quite hot at 28MHz during AØ 
emission.  For this reason, Ten Tec removed the low-Q suppressors and 
went back to cool-running silver-strap design  

cheers


-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>