Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Smallest practical 1.5KW 20uH coil

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Smallest practical 1.5KW 20uH coil
From: w4eto@earthlink.net (Richard W. Ehrhorn)
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 15:35:49 -0700
Hi Marv...

I'd go with the stacked T200-2 cores - Before winding, you can give 
yourself a bigger insulation margin of safety by wrapping the core stack 
with a couple of layers of Scotch/3M #25 fiberglas tape (can someone 
confirm that #25 is the right designation?) .

Don't know how you calculated it, but loss at 1.8-2.0 MHz should be almost 
unmeasurably small - anything over roughly 15W loss (1% or 0.04 dB at 1.5 
kW) would cause the toroid to run quite hot.  But in fact literally 
thousands of commercial amps have for decades used approximately the toroid 
inductor you describe without problems.

Good luck!

73,      Dick    W0ID


-----Original Message-----
From:   Radio WC6W [SMTP:wc6w@juno.com]
Sent:   Monday, January 24, 2000 11:11 PM
To:     amps@contesting.com
Subject:        [AMPS] Smallest practical 1.5KW 20uH coil


Hello to the group,
  I'm contemplating some alternative designs for a 20uH,160M "padder",
coil, to be switched in following the Pi-net roller coil in my 4-400A amp
under construction.

  The "typical" 3" long by 3" diameter section of B&W stock, including
reasonable clearance to adjacent components, would take up a bit too much
space in this instance.

  I thought of winding 20 turns of #10 teflon on four stacked
(Micrometals / Amidon) T200-2 iron powder toroids but, that also gets to
be rather large (2.25" diameter by 2.5" long) and is surprisingly lossy,
if I did the math correctly.

  I'm now considering a short solenoid cross section wound in the form of
two adjacent spirals (one spiraling into the center, the other out)
fabricated from .375 by .07 silver plated copper ribbon.   Sixteen turns,
8 in each spiral, in a 3" diameter by just under 1" thick form factor
should provide the requisite inductance.  I'll just slip some thin strips
of fiberglass between the turns to keep them properly spaced.  The only
drawback that I perceive in employing this geometry is the somewhat
higher than usual inter-turn capacitance but, this part is only for use
on 160M.

 Comments, suggestions, alternative ideas???  but, please no
superconductors! :-)

73,
  Marv WC6W











*

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>