Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] RE:

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] RE:
From: measures@vcnet.com (measures)
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:37:26 -0700
<rbigg@pcola.gulf.net>,
        "'amps'" <amps@contesting.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-amps@contesting.com 
Precedence: bulk
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C


>
>Ron, K5BDJ, asks
>
>>So, is there a strong case for ALC, when the capability is there?
>
>I'll stick my neck out a bit here. ALC as it is usually implemented  is a
>bit like shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted.

Excellent, Peter.



-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>