Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] Re: Poor Science

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science
From: rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:06:46 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: measures <2@vc.net>
To: Tom Rauch <W8JI@contesting.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Date: 06 March 2000 15:52
Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science


snip

>>I think someone has a parasitic fetish.
>>
>Mr. Rauch's attempt to introduce a sexual angle into this entangle is
>quite interesting.
The original (17th century) use of 'fetish' relates to excessive devotion to
objects or ideas, or belief in magical powers, and doesn't have any sexual
connotation.

Steve


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>