To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [AMPS] Re: Poor Science |
From: | rfamps@ic24.net (Steve Thompson) |
Date: | Tue, 7 Mar 2000 09:06:46 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: measures <2@vc.net> To: Tom Rauch <W8JI@contesting.com>; AMPS <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 06 March 2000 15:52 Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: Poor Science snip >>I think someone has a parasitic fetish. >> >Mr. Rauch's attempt to introduce a sexual angle into this entangle is >quite interesting. The original (17th century) use of 'fetish' relates to excessive devotion to objects or ideas, or belief in magical powers, and doesn't have any sexual connotation. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Re: Mission Impossible, Peter Chadwick |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [AMPS] PEP and IMD, Steve Thompson |
Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: Poor science, Terry Gaiser - W6RU |
Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re: Poor science, measures |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |