Tom says:
>At present price levels, it is impossible to get a quality low-noise
>high dynamic range A/D converter that is fast enough to do any
>good processing for anywhere near the price of a good crystal filter.
I'm not sure price comes into it......I don't think they exist with enough
bits at enough accuracy. The only real advantage I can see is the controlled
group delay for data modes. But I don't see why you can't use a crystal
filter, then DSP and equalise out the group delay - except for cost. Having
said all that, the Timewave is well worth having after all the crystal
filters. But DSP is the modern buzz word....
>what I want is a clean transmitter and a receiver that can crawl
right up
>against a 50 over nine signal and dig out an S3 signal.
Frequency synthesisers are not always the best approach for that...even a
DDS needs a 17 bit DAC accurate to 17 bits to ensure DAC spurs are more than
100dB down. (17 bit DAC accurate to 17 bits sounds silly - but many fast
DACs are not accurate to the number of bits)
73
Peter G3RZP
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|