>
>Hello, AMPers. Long time, no see.
>
>Someone asked me a question about hot switching today. I thought I
>understood this subject, but while I was thinking it through, I realized
>that I'm not entirely sure. The context was the unfortunate design flaw in
>the Yaesu FT-990 that causes it to apply RF a mere 3ms after keying the amp
>(it actually delays the RF envelope until 10ms after key closure, but
>inexplicably waits 7ms after key closure before keying the amp.)
A potentially disastrous delay could be caused by the relay in the radio
that keys the RL control line. To avoid hotswitching this relay is
removed and replaced with transistor switch.
> The guy is looking at a QRO HF-2000, and got this off their website:
>
>"We have designed the transmit/receive (T/R) switching so that
>the relays are momentarily "hot-shotted" with a large voltage spike
>to speed switching. Also, the same circuit that controls the cathode
>bias switching also controls the T/R switching. This means that
>whenever the T/R relays are in transmit, the correct linear operation
>cathode bias will be applied.
good news
>The T/R and cathode bias relays are
>sequenced so that no "hot switching" can occur. A fast open frame mechanical
>relay switches nearly as fast as some vacuum relays."
>
>Previously, I understood "hot switching" to mean that RF is applied to the
>tubes before the main relay has a chance to close.
True enough. One can also have hotswitching because the amp relays are
not fully opened before the subsequent RL signal arrives. .
>The tubes then transmit
>into thin air, causing arcing, pitting and burning of the T/R relay
>contacts.
Not if the relays are quick enough.
>The way I read it, QRO's sequencing circuit makes sure that the
>main T/R relay is closed before cutoff bias is removed from the tube, thus
>protecting the T/R relay contacts. True? However, since the 3ms provided by
>the FT-990 is not enough time for the T/R relay to close, won't the exciter
>RF be "hot switched" between the antenna and cathode input circuit?
Yes.
>Does
>this present a danger to the relay contacts that switch the exciter RF? If
>so, is this still called "hot switching?"
yes, yes.
>
>BTW, the guy asked if he could use the amp in QSK. Seems to me that even
>though they claim to have speeded up the open frame relay to be "nearly as
>fast as some vacuum relays" (5-8ms?), it still won't be fast enough for QSK.
>True?
>
True, Dick The puzzler is why QRO simply did not state how fast the
relays switch in their amplifier.
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|