Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

SV: SV: [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...."

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: SV: SV: [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...."
From: sm5ki@algonet.se (sm5ki)
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:46:59 +0000
Rich you did not understand my worries abt the switch: It is the rf current
I am worried abt. Tiny contacts that must handle ampereres of current. Is
there any overload capacity when mistuning? 

The 80 meter coil in the SB 220 is really soft even if the wire can handle
the rf current. How many amps have been designed with weak 80 and 160 meter
coils near metal walls just to show to the customer as much QRO as possible
in as small as possible box? How many watts are lost in amps with low
effiency? Would be nice if someone with an infrared camera could peep inside
 a number of amps and see where the power is lost?

I am sure many disc capacitors are overloaded and I really am worried about
those dic capacitors used as coupling capacitors from anode to pi or pi/L
output networks. A potent danger to the outside world if the antenna isnt
shorted from the DC point of view  or if the RFC at the output fails.

Guess I am spoiled having seen so many commercial Swedish Standard Radio
ship transmitters in the past . When I was employed in that factory around
1948, I had the pleasure to sit behind the drawing board and design those
heavy duty rf switches you can ( if you are lucky ) find as surplus in those
transmitters taken away from ships because of new international regulations.
You get as well those heavy duty roller coils and C-core 3 phase
transformers for 2000VDC and choke output.

Prosit de Hans SM5KI
----------
>Från: measures <2@vc.net>
>Till: <RMcGraw@blomand.net>
>Kopia: "sm5ki" <sm5ki@algonet.se>, "Steve Thompson" <rfamps@ic24.net>,
"AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>Ämne: Re: SV: [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...."
>Datum: lör 24 jun 2000 18.20
>

>
>>It seems that Hans knows how to keep an amp alive.  My SB-220 lived for
>>years and years with no problems.  Keem 'em cool is the secret to long
>>life for all parts.
>>
>However, if your tubes happen to have above average VHF amplification, 
>the SB-220 can occasionally oscillate at c. 110MHz.  Lower VHF Q 
>suppressors and glitch protection helps.  
>
>cheers, Bob
>
>>measures wrote:
>>> 
>>> >
>>> >The funny thing is that overloaded components sometimes last much longer
>>> >than theory says. Look at the old SB 220: that tiny receiving type switch 
>in
>>> >the output circuitry!
>>> 
>>> The measured breakdown V in the SB-220 bandswitch is c. 5000V.
>>> 
>>> > Very very soft as compared to commercial switches.
>>> >That very weak 80 meter coil!
>>> 
>>> It is #14 gauge copper with forced air cooling
>>> 
>>> >My ex amplifier ( the very first in Sweden
>>> >buit by me in 1968 -69? ) has never failed and is still in use up there
>>> >above the Arctic circle with its original 3-500Zs with graphite anodes.
>>> >Amazing. I always said, that one has to forget whats inside the SB 220 and
>>> >look at the performance instead.
>>> 
>>> Take a look inside and you will find forced air cooling on the tank and
>>> the filament pins.  This is good.
>>> 
>>> > A very fb buy at a used price only a little
>>> >bit higher than a pair of new 3-500ZGs made in France ( same as the 
>original
>>> >tubes - the only difference is that little glass plate that lifts up the
>>> >tube from the socket - less tendency for bad soldered pins to produce bad
>>> >contact ).
>>> 
>>> ''Bad solder'' results from the SB-220 cooling fan motor not turning
>>> freely due to lack of lubrication.  .  Oiling the fan bearings every
>>> couple of years will prevent this problem. .  In older units without oil
>>> holes,  drill c. #55 oil holes above the motor shaft.  Use a syringe for
>>> oiling.
>>> >
>>> cheers, Hans
>>> >----------
>>> >>Från: "Steve Thompson" <rfamps@ic24.net>
>>> >>Till: <amps@contesting.com>
>>> >>Ämne: Re: [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...."
>>> >>Datum: lör 24 jun 2000 07.17
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>From: N6BUU@aol.com <N6BUU@aol.com>
>>> >>To: 2@vc.net <2@vc.net>; philk5pc@tyler.net <philk5pc@tyler.net>;
>>> >>sm5ki@algonet.se <sm5ki@algonet.se>; n6er@yahoo.com <n6er@yahoo.com>;
>>> >>amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>> >>Date: 23 June 2000 19:59
>>> >>Subject: Re: [AMPS] " Kein Rauch ohne Feuer ...."
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>In a message dated 06/23/2000 11:22:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 2@vcnet
>>> >>>writes:
>>> >>>
>>> >>><<
>>> >>> As long as the hv ps  filter capacitors make it through the one-year
>>> >>> warranty period, all is well.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>> >>> end
>>> >>>  >>
>>> >>>ok rich i guess i asked for that one!   i just expect "parts" to last
>>> >>>somewhat longer, than the warrenty period.
>>> >>>                                    HANK
>>> >>>
>>> >>Treated reasonably they do this, nearly all the time. I'm sure we would 
>>have
>>> >>heard about it here if any amp brand had a tendency to fry its PSU in less
>>> >>than a few years. In truth, the reliability of raw components these days 
>is
>>> >>excellent.
>>> >>
>>> >>Is there any history that amps with 'insufficient' decoupling suffer early
>>> >>failure purely as a result of use on the lower bands? Is there any 
>evidence
>>> >>that rf hurts electrolytic capacitors?
>>> >>
>>> >>Steve
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>--
>>> >>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>> >>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>> >>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>> >>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>> >Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>> >Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>> >Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> 
>>> -  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>> end
>>> 
>>> --
>>> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>> Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>>> Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>> Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-  Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.  
>end
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>