>
>In light of all the technical discussions, running around in circles and
>mud-slinging, would anyone care to go back to arguing about how terrible
>CBers are, manufacturers that sell easily modified amps and the such?
>
>Sure seems we where a tad more technical than what is going on lately..
>
>Or, we can continue down the present course, and I am sure we will start
>seeing posts talking about other people mothers in the next week.
>
>
>Jeeze.. Give it a rest.
>
>Rich: Please email a copy of the "Grate Debate" to this address, as well.
>
Ok. It is in RTF. Word will open it. The file is 2.4MB. It contains
around one million words. The interesting stuff begins just after Mr.
Rauch mysteriously cancelled a post on 28 November. In this post he
proposes that we solve a suppressor problem of his own creation. Shortly
thereafter, he cancelled the article, and he has stonewalled it ever
since. .
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|