>
>Wrongo Tom!
The "expert" gets caught fabricating. My guess is that the expert's
sycophants will be complaining bitterly about you in secret to our
moderator.
>The later models, (specifically the I model, which was the last)
>and the when the government no longer needed them Bill Halligan returned the
>old HT-4 label to them, always had an a 250-T(L?) modulated by 100-TH's.
>The BC-610 was later replaced in military by the durable T-368 transmitter
>which used a 4-400 modulated by 4-125's, (Not my choice, I prefer triodes as
>modulators.). But they were never made with 813's or 833's.
Thanks for the real story, Mike
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
>To: <amps@contesting.com>; George T. Daughters
><gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 12:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [AMPS] BC610... no 833's
>
>
>>
>> > "BC-610 output tank coils that were used in a plate modulated
>> > c1940 transmitter that ran a pushpull pair of 833 modulated by 810's (?
>> > before my time). The BC-610 tank used a nifty swinging coil output link
>> > coupling."
>>
>> As I recall, later BC-610's used 813's modulated by 810's.
>>
>> Early ones used those old Eimac tubes like 100TL's or something.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73, Tom W8JI
>> w8ji@contesting.com
>>
>> --
- Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|