> All the proponents of grounded grid are violating Rich's Rules - that the
> voltage on the screen grid of a pentode must have constant voltage to
> produce an acceptable signal.
I prefer triodes in grounded grid, although some tetrodes work OK
in GG.
> Yet, in a grounded grid amplifier, the screen grid voltage varies with
> drive - just as the control grid voltage varies. It is not zero volts
> simply because the screen voltage is grounded. Heavy grid and screen
> current flow - contrary to Rich's Rules.
Heavy screen and grid current do not flow, unless the operating
parameters of the tube require it to be so. It is quite possible to
have a cathode-driven tetrode with zero mA of grid current, and a
wide range of screen current.
The thing I keep stressing is the linearity of the screen voltage, and
the phase of any variation in screen voltage (the same would be
true of grid bias).
If the tube is cathode-driven, the phase of the change in screen
voltage is exactly opposite of drive voltage. It exactly tracks in
phase, it's just always very close to 180 degrees out-of-phase. If
the screen voltage is reasonably high compared to the cathode
voltage swing, and if the phase is correct, all we have is
conventional negative feedback of limited voltage. Negative
feedback is generally a very good thing to have.
What we don't want is grid bias voltages following the envelope
(rather than the individual RF cycle) at a low frequency (audio) rate,
especially if there is phase difference. The DAF circuit does
exactly what we don't want the system to do.
The saving grace of the DAF circuit is the heavy negative RF
feedback (from cathode drive) helps correct for the "half-fast"
manner the circuit developes screen voltage.
> And, in grounded grid, the tetrode or pentode tube is being used in a
> manner other than how the factory intended.
So what? The "factory's" circuit recommendations are just typical
ideas, not the law. They offer some typical applications along with
some guidelines on limits. There is a considerable degree of
flexibility depending on end-use.
> Lastly, many commercial sweep tube amplifiers put out a -22 db distortion
> figure on a good day, if operated according to the factory.
And you know that because?
The 6LQ6/6MJ6 Ameritron sweep tube PA measured around -33
dB below one tone of a two tone test for third order. That would be -
39 dB according to ARRL standards.
> Using the same reasoning as Rich, may I proclaim that all grounded grid
> ampllifiers which use tetrodes are bad since I have measured a -20 db
> distortion level of a commercial grounded grid amplifier?
What amplifier measured that bad? It must have had problems.
The Ameritron used a 22 ohm cathode negative feedback resistor
to clean the PA up and reduce gain. The Amp Supply was a bit
worse because it used a system that tied the grid back to the
cathode, but that was an engineering flaw copied from a west coast
Handbook.
Even so, the Amp Supply (and Dentron) PA's were about 8 dB
better than the -20 dB (below one tone of two tones) that you
measured.
Does the fact you measured one bad sweep tube amp suddenly
mean the DAF is considered good engineering? (I don't think so.)
73, Tom W8JI
w8ji@contesting.com
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|