[AMPS] High-SWR protection

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	[AMPS] High-SWR protection
From:	k7fm@teleport.com (Colin Lamb)
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 09:20:00 -0800

Hi Steve:

Regarding your question of 35 -j35,  I come up with an swr of about 2.25,
using the Smith Chart.

K7FM




--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[AMPS] High-SWR protection, (continued) [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Lamb [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Lamb [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Lamb [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Lamb [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Steve [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Colin Lamb <= [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Lamb [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Phil Clements [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Vic Rosenthal [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman [AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman

Previous by Date:	[AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman
Next by Date:	SV: [AMPS] Portable linear using a DAF?, Tom Rauch
Previous by Thread:	[AMPS] High-SWR protection, Chuck Counselman
Next by Thread:	[AMPS] High-SWR protection, Tom Rauch
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]