>
>i dont think posting complainers to the list is a good move. send a copy to
>the trouble maker.
? Is pointing to techno-blather trouble making?
> ... dont make the whole list suffer due to personal conflics.
>
? Who or what is going to make 'the whole list suffer' by making them
read such, Tom? Some things I read - some things I don't. I don't
watch television wrestling.
cheers
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-amps@contesting.com [mailto:owner-amps@contesting.com]On
>Behalf Of 2
>Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 11:13 AM
>To: AMPS
>Subject: [AMPS] Expulsion policy on AMPS
>
>
>
>AMPS members --
>
>On two occasions, I have been booted off of AMPS. The reason was the
>same in each instance: Bipedal "Lap-dogs" kvetched to the moderator
>whenever their leader began to fare somewhat badly in a discussion.
>
>I propose that:
>1. Booting or not booting should be decided by a vote of AMPS members.
>2. To separate the men from the boys, the moderator should post a copy
>of all complaints.
>
>comments?
>
>- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>end
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>
>
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|