>The recent "forgeries" were even easier to spot, since they were
>from"z@vcnet", not "2@vcnet".
>
Both mailboxes belong to me. I subscribed with z@vc.net after 2@vc.net
was torpedoed by the cancelbot.
>Would you really call that a forgery?
I did not write it.
> I know the intent was to appear so,
>but anyone who reads even reasonably carefully would spot the difference.
>
Good point, Bill
cheers
>
>At 08:23 AM 6/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>Gentlemen
>>
>>One way to detect e.mail forgeries is to select "Show Long Headers" in
>>your e.mailer application. Compare the path of the suspect e.mail with
>>the path a known to be authentic sample.
>>
>>cheerio
>>
>>- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
>>end
>>
>>
>>--
>>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
>>Submissions: amps@contesting.com
>>Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
>>Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
>>
>>
>-
>Bill Aycock --- Persimmon Hill
> Woodville, Alabama, US 35776
> (in the N.E. corner of the State)
> W4BSG -- Grid EM64vr
> baycock@HiWAAY.net
> w4bsg@arrl.net
>
- R. L. Measures, 805.386.3734,AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|