[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc

To:	<amps@contesting.com>
Subject:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc
From:	Wlfuqu00@uky.edu (wlfuqu00@uky.edu)
Date:	Mon, 01 Apr 2002 08:57:50 -0500

At 06:33 AM 4/1/02 -0500, Roger D. Johnson wrote:
>?  As long as rotten splatter doesn't go outside the band, it is not
>against the Part 97 rules.
>
>Not True! See Part 97 - section 307a


And it is rather inconsiderate....

73
Bill wa4lav



>73, Roger
>
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Roger D. Johnson [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, wlfuqu00@uky.edu <= [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Tom Rauch [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, <kc4slk@csrlink.net (Mike Sawyer) [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, <K4XL@arrl.net (Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL) [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Terry Gaiser [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Bill Weinel [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard [Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, John

Previous by Date:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Roger D. Johnson
Next by Date:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard
Previous by Thread:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Roger D. Johnson
Next by Thread:	[Amps] IMD vs. Vcc, Richard
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]