OM:
I don't have a dog in this fight and don't desire to pick an argument.
Before you identify something as non-sense have you considered the
following? Lets assume we have two signals going into a heterodyning
mixer stage and the two frequencies are 6 MHz and 8MHz. On the output
of that mixer one could expect to find 4 signals, not two signals.
That is the two fundamental signals of 6 MHz and 8 MHz as well as the
sum frequency and the difference frequency of the two applied signals
or 2 MHz and 14 MHz.
You will note that 2, 6, 8, 14 are even multiples or harmonically
related to a specific integer. I don't know what you would call it
unless you called it harmonics (higher and sub). Perhaps the
engineering school I attended was wrong and the professors didn't know
what they were talking about. I learn something new every day so
perhaps this is it for this day. Thanks for enlightening me.
73,
Leon W5NA
It seems to me that saying it is non-sense is a bit exaggerated
----- Original Message -----
From: <i4jmy@iol.it>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:30 AM
Subject: [Amps] Nonsense
> Tecnically, sub-harmonic is a pure nonsense.
> It shouldn't be a term used to identify a frquency product that's
> obtained by specific and peculiar situations.
> It would be bad and didactically misleading if someone here did take
it
> seriously.
>
> 73,
> Mauri I4JMY
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|