>>At 08:51 AM 3/27/2003 -0800, 2 wrote:
>>** After the October 1988 article on improved parasitic-suppression
>>appeared in *QST*, Ten-Tec tried low VHF-Q suppressors but they abandoned
>>the idea after they found such suppressors get quite hot at 29MHz on RTTY
>>mode. Nacherally, this meant the suppressors were doing their job.
>
>And as I recall Rich's article resulted in PLENTY of work for the TT Service
>Department repairing customer amps from the damage caused by some
>of the "article tricks" that he seems to constantly try to champion on here.
>
** So even though Ten-Tec knew that low-Q vhf suppressors damage
amplifiers, they used them on their new amplifier?
>Call TT and see if they remember Rich's callsign/name or not ... B-)
>
>
>73 Billy AA4NU
- R. L. Measures, a.k.a. Rich..., 805.386.3734, AG6K,
www.vcnet.com/measures.
end
|