| To: | "Partain, Chuck" <Chuck_Partain@Maxtor.com>,"'amps@contesting.com'" <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again |
| From: | R.Measures <r@somis.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:37:39 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
** More R means less V-regulation. >Maybe I am missing something. If a transformer is able to handle the output >current without getting hot or saturating and it meets the size requirement >why is the secondary resistance should a concern???? > >Chuck Partain >Cte Lab HP Qualifications >508-770-3496 > > >_______________________________________________ >Amps mailing list >Amps@contesting.com >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps > _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Power-off tube cooling, R . Measures |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] NCL-2000, R . Measures |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again, Ian White, G3SEK |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] transformer secondary winding resistance here we go again, RFlabnotes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |