Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service

To: "amps@contesting.com" <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Centurion cooling improvement ideas for AM service
From: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:44:10 -0400
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Rob and Gary,
Correct, that's why I mentioned earlier the plate transformer needs to be designed to handle at least 100% of the power that the carrier creates. If the transformer is sized to supply 50% of the peak power input, it will always be capable of sustaining the carrier at 100% duty cycle. The heater supply and control grid supply should be rated at 100% duty cycle, though. In most all large amps, these are supplied by separate transformers, but I have seen some wound on the same cores. All this needs to be calculated in at design time.


I always heard the controversy of the Heathkit SB-220's plate transformer being too small. I never did get a chance to reverse engineer one, but If I knew the core dimensions, and winding wire sizes, I could tell what they done pretty quick. I did always here by others that the plate transformer in the SB-220 actually did exactly what it was supposed to do if the amp was run correctly. If the core was a shade small, and they used at least 700 circular mils per amp on the wire, it should be ok. If they used 500 circular mils per amp, it might have got hot. At 500 circular mils per amp, 14 gauge wire is rated for only 7 amps instead of the 15 amps for conduit rating. The problem is, the heat can't escape quick enough out of the tight coils and dissipate. So a minimum of 500 was devised by the transformer manufacturers. This is what you get from most "off-the-shelf" transformers. Amateur, and commercial equipment, is a horse of a different color when determining transformer sizes and power ratings.

One manufacturer that can be learned from is Hammond Manufacturing. They wind countless numbers of transformers for tube type audio service. I have reverse engineered several of their transformers by core size and Kva rating. All have came out to the same power rating as I calculate one. Most of Peter Dahls do too. Some of Dahls direct replacements do not however. I assume that they don't because they were wound by the original specs from the end equipment manufacturers. Keeping in mind that if the core size was made larger, the transformer wouldn't bolt up in the equipment! Without know what wire they used, I can't say if they raised the value or not. They can't that much as the coil couldn't fit in the windows of the core.

Will Matney
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>