Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots
From: "DF3KV" <df3kv@aol.com>
Reply-to: DF3KV <df3kv@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:40:03 +0200
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Root" <steve.root@culligan4water.com>

> My experience has been different.  If there's a problem with my
Cabrillo
> log, the Robot returns an e-mail that spells out the problem and
allows me
> to make corrections on the spot.  The second attempt is then
accepted so the
> problem has been resolved in a matter of minutes.  This is a huge
> improvement over the old days when you'd wait months to see the
results and
> find yourself in the wrong category or a check log.
>
> The volunteers behind this technology have really done an excellent
job in
> my opinion.

I totally agree on that.
It is much better to be told by the robot for immediate trials and
corrections then having the log unchecked with errors at the log
checkers

73
Peter

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Amps] Re: [CQ-Contest] Robots, DF3KV <=