Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Two quick loading questions

To: Rob & Terri Sherwood <rob@sherweng.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Two quick loading questions
From: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Reply-to: garyschafer@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:23:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
It is not always easy to see flattoping on a scope. Especially when using any kind of speech processing. The processing itself tends to square off the peaks. So when you actually observe flattoping on the scope you are probably well into it.

73
Gary  K4FMX

Rob & Terri Sherwood wrote:
I have always been puzzled by the "maximum smoke" tuning recommendations of some amps, AL-80A or B, for example.
A single 3-500Z in linear service is rated at 400 mA plate current. (350 mA in class C).
When I used to run a Measures/Kessler modified TL-922A (pair of tubes), I tuned it as follows:
800 mA on the plate and 150 mA on the grid for SSB. If I was running CW, I tuned it for 200 mA on the grid.
It was very easy to adjust the plate tuning for a grid current peak, as opposed to trying to see a broad plate current dip.
When tuned for the 800/150 mA conditions, the amp was very linear at 800 mA, and would saturate at something approaching 900 mA.
I always monitor my amps with a Tektronix scope, and set the RF envelope at 6 divisions at the above plate/grid current conditions.
With a modest amount of speech processing to control the peaks from the exciter, it is easy to see the linear flattop a bit above the 6 scope divisions.
Set the drive on the exciter to peak the amp at 6 divisions, and I am completely confident I have a clean signal.
Without a scope, it is difficult to know how hard to drive the amp. The ballistics of analog meters is all over the map. My Alpha 76PA was very different from my TL-922A meters. My present Alpha 99 and 89 amps, even with LED metering, are not peak reading devices. In these two Alpha examples, if the power output is set for 1500 watts key down, the LED meters read about 800 watts on voice peaks.
R.Measures wrote:


Tuning for max P-out with max-drive is more important than looking for a dip.

On Feb 9, 2005, at 12:39 PM, George KB2Z wrote:

I'm sure I'm not the first to ask. I have searched in the archives and did not find a solid answer. I apologize up front and am not trying to waste anyones time. The directions from different manufacturers dont seem to answer one way.
As I read the loading instructions for gg hf amps, (2x3-500) they should be fully loaded at full power then the loading increased 5 to 10% to lower the Ig and help stabilize the output. This seems to be where it gets confusing for me.


1) After increasing the loading 5 to 10%, should the plate be re-dipped?
2) If drive is reduced from 100 to 50W, should the plate be re-dipped.

Thanks in advance, George KB2Z

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps



Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps




_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps





_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>