Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500

To: Phil Clements <philk5pc@tyler.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] AL-1200 vs AL-1500
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:39:15 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Feb 24, 2005, at 11:45 AM, Phil Clements wrote:

>> The AL1500 will output more power but the difference is not more than 
>> a dB
>> or two. It has been very rare to hear of a 3CX1200 tube failure 
>> leading one to
>> think the tube might be more robust than the 8877.
>>
>> 73,
>> K5GW
>
> I remember us talking about the 3CX1200's in you store when they first 
> hit the
> market. You thought at that time that the tube would be the 4-1000A of 
> the 21st
> century. I think time has proven you right.

With good engineering practice, a 4-1000A / 8166 will deliver 3kW PEP.  
I know of no case where a 1200A7 has delivered this much.

>  I only regret that some
> manufacturers chose the "A7" instead of the "Z7"....the track record 
> would be
> more sterling than it has been.

Amen to that.  The A7 has 0.2pF of feedback and the Z7 has about 
one-third of that.  Thus, the A7 is clearly the best choice for 
oscillator service.
>
> (((73)))
> Phil, K5PC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>