Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Better electrical safety?

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Better electrical safety?
From: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:13:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
To: <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Better electrical safety?


> At 04:43 AM 11/19/2005, Peter Chadwick wrote:
> 
>>A problem with a 1kHz supply would be stopping it getting into audio 
>>systems in radio, TV etc, as well as phones. Then there's the 
>>problem of 'singing' motors and transformers and even flourescent 
>>lights. So it either has to be low in frequency or high enough that 
>>it's beyong audibility. Then we have other problems..
>>
>>73
>>
>>Peter G3RZP
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> If you mean the mechanical vibration at 1kHz, I agree it might be 
> difficult to eliminate, but still worth experimenting with. If you 
> mean the electrical noise, it should be easy to filter I'd think. As 
> I said, some research would be needed to find the optimum frequency.
> 
mm waves. No wiring, just plumbing.
Radiant electric heat will take on a whole new meaning.
Mike k1ern

> 73, Bill W6WRT
> 
> _______________________________________________
>
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>