| To: | amps@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Amps] Matching | 
| From: | Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk> | 
| Date: | Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:31:56 +0000 | 
| List-post: | <mailto:amps@contesting.com> | 
All this thinking is getting me confused. I'm back to my original conclusion. As an example, take an impedance of 100 + j50 ohms, which you want to match to 50R resistive. I can see two L match solutions, which have a loaded Q of about 1.2. A T match can do it with a loaded Q of about 1.04. I can't see any L match that betters this. Can someone correct me if I'm wrong? Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: ?Antenna traps, R . Measures | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] Designing the Cleanest Linear with RF Negative Feedback, wc6w@juno.com | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] *** SPAM *** Re: ÂAntenna traps, Peter Chadwick | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Matching, Peter Chadwick | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |