Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppressor resistor

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Parasitic suppressor resistor
From: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 09:04:55 +0000
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

Bill Turner wrote:
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> 
> At 04:22 PM 1/1/2006, R. Measures wrote:
> 
>>**  A problem with a resistor that is c. 120mm long is that has more 
>>L than would be optimal for a parasitic suppressor.

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> I thought about that, but the L would be there anyway. The 8877 sits 
> low on the chassis and the top of the plate choke is six inches above 
> the chassis, so the wire would be that long anyway. I guess I could 
> have mounted the choke horizontal but it's too late now.  :-)
Having the L in the resistor is different from having it in series with 
the resistor/inductor suppressor. Whether the difference matters is 
unique to your amplifier and its gain/phase characteristics. If you can 
measure them, you can design a suppressor that's spot on for the job - 
if you can measure them, you might find that you can make an amp that 
avoids oscillation without needing a suppressor.

Steve
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>