Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac?

To: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Subject: Re: [Amps] Burn-in for Eimac?
From: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:35:24 -0800
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On Jan 16, 2006, at 3:55 PM, gdaught6@stanford.edu wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> A few days ago, someone asked "where is the getter on a thoriated
> tungsten filament tube?" [as opposed to an oxide cathode tube...]
>
> I just spent the morning with an expert in rebuilding of thoriated
> tungsten filament tubes, and asked him that exact question.  He told
> me "it depends on the tube."  Then he showed me a few examples:  one
> type was a small disc (zirconium) near the base of the filament
> support pedestal; another was a zirconium wire helically wound on a
> molybdenum pedestal at the center (coaxial with) of the filament
> structure.  He told me "it's almost always zirconium, because that
> stuff LOVES to mop up gases, especially oxygen."

George -- What gettering material is use to mop up nitrogen?
>
> Then came what I consider very important knowledge:
>
> "The getters are heated by their proximity to the filament structure.
>  That's why you should run the tubes at the full rated filament
> voltage for about a hundred hours.  Then you can reduce the filament
> voltage a bit while still maintaining the desired output."
>
> 73,
>
>
>
>
> George T. Daughters, K6GT
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>