On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:00 PM, Gudguyham@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/16/2006 7:53:46 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> df3kv@t-online.de writes:
>
> The crest of the envelope in that example is 400V.
> Since 400V peak equal 282V effective, PEP power is 1600W not 3200W.
>
> 73
> Peter
>
>
>
> The measurement was made with a scope and the highest peak was
> singled out
> and at that point the peak power was 3200 W, but looking at the
> complete wave
> including the low spots the PEP would be 1600 per definition. Now
> I guess we
> have to ask Rich what he is driving at.
This matter has nothing to do with driving, Lou, however, I drive a
Prius.
> To qualify my answer I would say
> that the peak power was 3200 W but the PEP power over the
> completed wave was
> 1600. W
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734
r@somis.org
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|