Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] "10 Meter Ban" to be lifted ...

To: <Gudguyham@aol.com>, <w4tv@subich.com>, <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] "10 Meter Ban" to be lifted ...
From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:13:22 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Gudguyham@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:51 PM
> To: w4tv@subich.com; garyschafer@comcast.net; amps@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] "10 Meter Ban" to be lifted ...
> 
> 
> In a message dated 10/15/2006 1:38:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> w4tv@subich.com writes:
> 
> Also I  think most people believed that with 1 kw average
> > input as the legal  limit that meant that 2kw pep was also the
> > legal limit because of the  perceived 2:1 ratio.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the ARRL license manual back in the
> early 60's early 70's perhaps  say that PEP was about 2 times DC plate
> power? 

The ARRL ssb handbook used to say something like that. They did say with 2
tone test but also alluded to the 2 times average for voice also.

 I
> recall for many years "myself" believing this. Though very  momentary
> peaks
> may be 4 or 5 times that , the "envelope" over one cycle would  average
> about 2
> times. 

Not sure what you are saying here?

Are we getting over technical?   Lou

73 
Gary  K4FMX


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>