Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] FW: ÂCeramic capacitor ratings

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] FW: ÂCeramic capacitor ratings
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:02:26 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
It didn't help that in this particular case (a mil product, too) they uprated 
from 350 watts to 900 watts on CW by changing tubes, filament and HV 
transformers, but not the ceramic tuning caps......or providing tube 
manufacturers rated airflow across the tube socket, either.
Pye Telecommunications in the UK were reputed to clip out bypass caps until it 
started oscillating, and then replace the last one. However, production 
tolerances can play merry hell with that approach, and it costs a lot more to 
fix a batch of oscillating IF strips than to put the extra few cents worth of 
components in in the first place. But the beanies don't understand that..... 
until it happens. I've known companies who have asked for a batch of ICs to be 
selected to be at the low gain end of the spread because they didn't follow the 
applications recommendations (to save money, of course) and the circuit 
oscillated with ones at the high gain end. And the other way around. 
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Amps] FW: ÂCeramic capacitor ratings, Peter Chadwick <=