Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Filtering Negative SIde of PS

To: Amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Filtering Negative SIde of PS
From: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:35:17 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>

KV5I said:
>Could I get some recommendations on literature of Pros, Cons, and How to's?<
There's a bit on it in the older ARRL Handbooks in the Power Supplies section..
I've been doing it for over 20 years. I tune the choke slightly HF, so it looks 
like a bigger inductor - I don't believe that you want it actually resonant at 
twice line frequency, because of the voltages involved. Advantages include the 
fact that the choke insulation requirements are reduced. Disadvantage is that 
if the choke opens, it gets the full HV across it, so a spark gap or some other 
sort of protection across it is a reasonable idea. But one that can handle the 
energy! If tuning the choke, bear in mind the AC current rating needed in the 
capacitor. I use 3 paralleled 0.1 mFd wartime paper caps meant for radar 
modulators. The best method of tuning the choke is to use an audio sig gen and 
scope, rather than tweaking things with the HV on. Bear in mind that you'll get 
a lower frequency under such test conditions, because you won't have the DC 
bleed current flowing, which will reduce the inductance. Actual resonance is to 
be avoided - W8JI can tell you about that - he ha
 s a real horror story from his experience. 
The SG supply for my amp also uses negative lead filtering. Here, I cheat a 
bit, because I rectify the AC across the choke to get a negative bias supply. 
This has been working for 20 years, too.
73
Peter G3RZP
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>