Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Martin's Comments on EB-104 Pictures

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Martin's Comments on EB-104 Pictures
From: "LA7SL Nils P. Pedersen" <la7sl@online.no>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:04:28 +0200
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
This is what I got when trying to enter http://www.k6if.com/gallery2  just 
now 18:03 UTC
July 8.

Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable 
to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, cgiadmin@yourhostingaccount.com and 
inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done 
that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.


Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an 
ErrorDocument to handle the request.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
To: <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Martin's Comments on EB-104 Pictures


> Martin,
>
> Thanks very much for taking the time to write this detailed set of 
> comments.
> We appreciate them, and will take them to heart as we continue with our
> project.
>
> As I'm sure you all know, the actual RF amplifier modules are just one 
> part
> of a project to build a legal limit solid state amplifier.  In the Project
> Gamma design, we are starting with EB-104 boards precisely because they 
> are
> a proven design that has lasted the test of time and are known to produce
> high quality class AB SSB output.  When and if someone comes up with a
> "better" RF module, we will be more than happy to swap it in!
>
> We posted these pictures primarily because lots of folks are building 
> EB-104
> based amps, and the previously available construction documentation is
> terrible.  We hope that by publishing this more detailed photographic 
> record
> of 'correct' construction, we can help others get a better result.
>
> Finally, a note on the project website.
>
> Google continues to consider www.k6if.com a bad site, although we believe
> that we have removed all of the offending material (we were subject to an
> iframe malware attack).  Google should review the site soon, and hopefully
> remove it from their list.  McAfee SiteAdvisor considers the site safe at
> this point - but the site is still in flux as we continue our efforts.
>
> The various photo galleries are available (and should be safe) at
> http://www.k6if.com/gallery2 .  You will still get a warning if you are
> using Firefox due to Google's concerns.
>
>                        ***dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.6/1540 - Release Date: 7/8/2008 
> 6:33 AM
>
> 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.4.6/1540 - Release Date: 7/8/2008 6:33 AM

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>