Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Fw: High SWR = Baluns actually- back to amps!!

To: "herzog@frontiernet.net@frontiernet.net" <herzog@frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fw: High SWR = Baluns actually- back to amps!!
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:41:12 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:07:56 -0400,
"herzog@frontiernet.net@frontiernet.net" <herzog@frontiernet.net>
wrote:

>This problem reared its ugly face when 160 meters went QRO, and
>the WARC
>bands were added. An 80-40-20-15-10 meter design was very forgiving. You
>could use military/commercial band switches from WW II, and with even a
>not so perfect layout, you came out just fine.

REPLY:

Same with my amp. Without the 160 meter coil, perfectly stable. With
it, 15 meters became unusable. The Tesla effect was so bad it affected
a fluorescent light hanging from the ceiling ten feet away! 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>