Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF ci

To: Pete Lancashire <pete@petelancashire.com>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits?
From: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Reply-to: audioguy@charter.net
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:11:20 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Very interesting responses, thanks.

DigiKey stocks some Stackpole RNC and "RNCS", which Stackpole claims are 
"Ideal replacement for costly Tantalum Nitride resistors" .

I wasn't able to quickly find stock on the Vishay-Dale parts in the 
usual places, but the data sheet looks good.

Now if I could only learn to solder surface-mount components without 
making such a mess.

Thanks and 73,
Jim, N7CXI

Pete Lancashire wrote:
> Not to push on company over another, I found some of this to be helpful
> 
> http://www.vishay.com/resistors-discrete/list/product-31025/
> 
> For those oldtimers, Vishey bought Dale.
> 
> 
> 
>> Hi Jim,
>>   I'd suggest using mil type RLR or if you realllly want long term
>> reliabilty use type RNC.
>>
>>   Either one will last near forever.  No comparison to carbon comp or even
>> film.
>>
>> 73 & Good morning,
>>   Marv WC6W
>>
>> http://wc6w.50webs.com/
>>
>>
>> --- On Wed, 8/12/09, Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
>>> Subject: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power
>>> RF circuits?
>>> To: "AMPS" <amps@contesting.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 1:06 PM
>>> If you wanted a precision RF
>>> instrument to last a long time without
>>> significant component drift, would you use carbon film or
>>> metal oxide
>>> resistors?
>>>
>>> Assumptions:
>>> (1) Little to no RF power dissipated in the resistors
>>> themselves
>>> (2) Frequency less than 60mhz
>>> (3) There would be room for physically larger 1-watt
>>> metal-oxide
>>> (4) Cost isn't an issue (repair quantities, mostly)
>>>
>>> Looking for opinions, of course. I find myself replacing
>>> carbon
>>> composition units all the time, and was wondering if
>>> metal-oxide would
>>> be "better" than carbon-film for these purposes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jim, N7CXI
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amps mailing list
>>> Amps@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amps mailing list
>> Amps@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>