Nonsense yourself.
Each tube has its own parasitic signature and doesnt need a supporting cast
to determine it.
John understands the process and explained it well.
Going by your idea every amp would need a different suppressor design when
all used the same tube. The path you described is well below high VHF and
can be seen with a GDO or VNA. Most of the time it is harmless.
Tube engineering traditiion places the suppressor right at the plate cap for
a reason and not somewhere on an imagined or arbitrary tuned line.
Carl
KM1H
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: "Amp Reflector" <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
> On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:55:12 -0400, "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>BTW, the strays have minimal effect on a parasitic. If you note, the
>>suppressor is before any LC circuitry. Tubes have their own built-in
>>natural
>>parasitic resonance
>
> REPLY:
>
> Nonsense.
>
> The "stray" inductance introduced by the wire from the anode to the
> blocking
> cap, from the blocking cap to the tune cap and the internal lead length
> inside
> the tune cap, and the return through the chassis back to the tube are
> ABSOLUTELY
> ESSENTIAL. to creating the VHF resonant circuit in the first place. The
> parasitic suppressor is not "before" this LC circuit, it is right in the
> middle
> of it.
>
> Those are all "strays" and to say they have "minimal effect" on a
> parasitic is
> ridiculous.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|