To: | Amps reflector <amps@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Q vs Load vs Tuning: Myths debunked |
From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
Date: | Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:09:32 -0700 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:19:37 -0700 (PDT), Robert Groh <rgroh@swbell.net> wrote: > >Excellent email, Bill. Well reasoned, technically correct and backed up by >data - nice job. This one I keep - for the rest, well, as you say, there is >always the 'Delete' key (although the Delete key has certainly been getting a >work out lately!). > >73 >Bob Groh, WA2CKY REPLY: Thanks, Bob. You make me feel the effort was worthwhile. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] Loaded output circuits, Bill, W6WRT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] SB-220 bias question, Gary Schafer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Q vs Load vs Tuning: Myths debunked, Robert Groh |
Next by Thread: | [Amps] LK-500 Grid Current issue, R. David Eagle |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |