Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] power meters for HF/VHF

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: [Amps] power meters for HF/VHF
From: John Lyles <jtml@losalamos.com>
Reply-to: jtml@vla.com
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:22:09 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
The Cantenna in question (70 ohms) is no good. As others said, replace 
the element, someone cooked it too hard.

Dr. Dave K. is spot on, Bird 43 is not a laboratory instrument. Just a 
rough indicator. Certainly useful when trimming antennas to watch 
reflected power, or to tune the input of an amplifier, or the output for 
maximum. When measuring efficiency, gain, anything where you do need 
better than 5%, use directional couplers and attenuators, and bench 
power meters like the old HP 436/437/438 series. Other manufacturers 
such as Boonton also make decent meters. These can be gotten on epay for
reasonable cost. If you have access to a network analyzer, even the 
TenTec kit, or a good gain/loss set, you can check and calibrate your 
own couplers and pads at the exact frequency being tested.

Good power metering is obviously needed if you are making commercial 
rigs and amplifiers. Calorimetric dummy loads can be fashioned from 
standard plumbing, if you can find an accurate flow meter and a pair of 
thermometers in wells. But working with only a few deg C rise in water 
temperature requires that all systematic errors be removed first. Like 
offsets between thermometers, recording this value with no RF applied.

And if the load resistor that is being cooled has flat response down to 
DC or 60 Hz, you can apply power at these ranges and measure the applied 
power using ammeter and voltmeters, to do a transfer calibration check 
with your RF/calorimeter measurement.

I'd guess that the cooling air measurement would be fraught with errors. 
We used small temperature sensors in the exhaust of the Broadcast 
Electronics cavity amplifiers for FM, that would readout on the screen 
and give you a warm feeling about how you were tuning the PA, for best 
efficiency or far off of normal. But nothing was accurate enough to 
calculate power.

Using calorimetric water loads, meters on the plate DC power, and 
directional coupler measurements at work, I can usually get within 5%
on power balance, which is considered good. I trust the couplers and 
power meters the most, as I can measure the coupling of a line section 
to better than 0.02 dB using a network analyzer. And the power meters 
can be checked, send out for calibration. This is acceptable to the gov't.

73
John
K5PRO
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>