Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] pi-net spreadsheet question

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] pi-net spreadsheet question
From: "Jim Thomson" <Jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 05:30:16 -0700
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 23:03:33 -0700
From: Vic K2VCO <vic@rakefet.com>

 pi-net spreadsheet question

I'm using the GM3SEK pi-net design spreadsheet 
<http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek/>. It 
requires that you enter the inductance and resistance used in the parasitic 
suppressor. 
What I'm wondering is how to do this for two tubes in parallel, where there are 
two 
suppressors.

Do you enter the value of one coil and resistor, or do you treat it as though 
these 
components are in parallel?

##  excellent question.. and I have been  using his pi sheet  for yrs now... 
but only
1 x tube amps... or  2 x GS35bs... where no suppressor is used at all. 

## I'd say to parallel  the values of the 2 x suppressors. If it's a GG amp, 
the grids
are in parallel at one end.   The plate block cap is where the 2 x suppressors  
come
together at the other end.  




This makes a big difference at 28 and 21 MHz.

I am finding this exercise very interesting, playing with the value of "lead 
inductance". 
I'm trying to add a small "l network" before the main pi network which will 
cancel out 
some of the large amount of output capacity of a pair of 813's so they will be 
reasonably 
efficient on 10 and 15 meters. The parasitic suppressors become part of this, 
too.

##  that  feature is the BEST part of the spread sheet !  Start  with just the 
paralleled
suppressors, NO lead uh.    The tune cap may end up neg value.. or very low.. 
like
just a few pf.  [say for a Q=14-18]    Take  what ever value it spits out for 
the main coil..
and then divide by 2.    EG:  spits  out  say .. '.8 uh'      .8/2 = .4uh     
Ok, then make the
lead uh  .4 uh.   Main coil value may well change.   Juggle the lead Uh  value, 
 till BOTH the
lead uh  and main coil are identical.

##  Ok, now you can probably DEcrease the loaded Q.  This all depends on Min C 
u have
and whether a vac cap is used, etc. 
The idea here is to obtain the lowest Q  you can, and still not have the  tune 
cap totally 
unmeshed.. and  keep the main coil  and 'lead uh'  the same value. 

##  I call the result  a  ' L-PI'   and it  works  very well !  On my  160-15m 
[ no 10+12m]
3CX-3000A7  amp,  sure, it would tune 15m.. with out the extra .66 uh   b4 the  
main 
pi-net.. but loaded Q  was WAY too high for my liking.  Also, my 15 M  position 
 is also
used on 17m.    So  loaded Q on 17M  is through the roof.    The 3x3 tube has 
24 pf of
anode to grid C... and rises to 33 pf.. when  tube in the socket.  Min C  of 
the vac cap is
12 pf... so I have 45 pf.. with the vac cap unmeshed ! 

##  with  .66uh  b4 the pi -net.....  plate load Z  drops way down. Now I can 
get the loaded Q
on 15m  down to just 8....... which  rises  to  Q=12  when on 17M. 

##  In this case.. a  .66 uh coil  was made  from 7 x turns  of  3/8"  od 
tubing... on a 1.5" ID. 
The .66 uh coil  is  at right angles to main tank coil.   I THINK  the  
harmonic suppression  increases
having the  2 x coils at right angles.    Main tank coil was 3" OD.. also made 
of 3/8" OD tubing.

##  so the extra coil doesn't have to be the same diam as main coil.  In my 
case,  I wanted it
long and skinny, to  bridge  the gap  between Plate block cap assy.. and vac 
tune cap. 

##  on another amp,  the  vac tune cap was tapped  one turn into the main coil. 
 In this case,  it's
all one  coil.  So both  coil  orientation schemes have been tried, and both  
work very well. 

##  On older desk  top amps, where loaded Q is sky high on 10M... adding a tiny 
bit of uh between
plate block cap and C1 cap does wonders.  The extra uh can also go anywhere 
between the anode
and  C1 cap.   Then, using the  stock value  10m tank coil... the loaded Q  
drops like a rock, way less
circulating current, more eff, and  main tank coil and the poor  band switch  
don't get cooked!   But the
extra L  coil has to be same OD  as main tank coil.. or bigger, if main 10m 
tank coil is marginal to start
with.  

##  I designed a 6m  8877 tank coil  setup for a fellow 2 yrs ago.   It used a 
.5 uh coil... wound with
1/2"  wide flat strap... and tapped  dead center in the middle of the coil.. 
with the tune cap. The strap
coil is wound like a suppressor.. with the advantage that there is  zip  C  
between  turns.. since they
look like  knife edges facing each other.     3/8"  wide  strap is the eq of  
1/4"  tubing, since the 
circumference of both is aprx the same. 1/2"  wide strap = .318" OD  tubing, 
etc.   He ends  up
with .25uh on either  side of the tune cap.   This works  very well.    Two  
separate .25 uh  coils
can also be wound... and at right angles, or anything from in line to 90 degs  
between em.   

##  That  extra L  coil  gets installed on all my amps, since  I discovered the 
spread sheet, 10-12
yrs ago.   b4 that.. the  maths  by hand was tedious.

later....... Jim  VE7RF    

-- 
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>